 |
Life
expectancy in even the most desperately poor countries is now
over twice that at the beginning of the 20th century. The world
continues to feed itself, despite a near doubling of population
since 1960. These remarkable achievements are the result of
research: research that has created new technologies to address
seemingly intractable problems of poor health, hunger and environmental
sustainability. Research
underpins much of the progress that has been made towards
realising the Millennium Development Goals. Technological
and social development research has helped to reduce child
and adult mortality, make water safe to drink, and increase
the amount of food that can be grown.
But
in general global research systems are failing the poor. Over
90% of medical research for example, addresses the health
concerns of rich countries. Less than 1% of funds are used
to develop vaccines against tropical diseases. Research into
improving the staple food crops of the poor is very limited.
Poor countries are being by-passed by the rapid technological
gains achieved by the rest of the world. The world is divided
not just by poverty, but by technology, and the investment
priorities of the North.
Research
systems need to work better for the poor to help them face
present and future challenges. Almost certainly we need to
increase our financial investments in such research. But doing
‘more of the same’ is not the answer. We also
need to reconfigure the way in which we invest in, and manage,
research.
The
rapid rise in technological innovation has been driven by
a transformation in the way in which research systems are
managed. A similar transformation is now needed in low-income
countries, and in global research systems that impact on poor
people.
Approaches
that we believe will improve research innovation include:
-
The
use of alternative financial instruments to create a market
for merit-good technologies. Research prizes, advance
purchase contracts and Intellectual Property Buy-Outs
are some examples that create outcome-based incentives
for both public and private research systems;
-
Helping
the poor to gain the capacity to engage with, and participate
in, public and private research, and to ensure that their
agendas and needs are fully considered by the research
community; and
-
Building
research networks in order to capitalise on the knowledge
and expertise of other research players. Too much research
is conducted in isolation of others: cooperation between
different countries, between the public and private sector,
and between donors, is weak. New partnerships, including
Public Private Partnerships and Global Challenge Programmes,
help capitalise on the strengths of different players
in a global research system.
theIDLgroup
works with local and national research systems, international
networks and with donors to help them improve the way in which
they support research. We:
- Review
ongoing research investments and provide advice on ways
in which current investments can be strengthened, informed
by the latest thinking in research management;
- Develop
new instruments for research management, in partnership
with key stakeholders, to ensure that new approaches are
owned and championed by those responsible for making the
change; and
- Produce
‘think pieces’ on innovative ways in which research
can be managed. We have a reputation for ‘thinking
outside of the box’ and contribute to donor and government
understanding of the different ways of investing in, and
delivering, better research outcomes.
Examples
of Relevant Experience
We
have reviewed major DFID investments in agricultural research
in Kenya, Bangladesh and Nepal (over 20 reviews since 1992).
We
have developed new research management instruments. Examples
include the establishment of a competitive research fund within
the National Veterinary Research Institute in Indonesia, the
creation of user-driven research in Uganda, and the formation
of a Global Public Private Partnerships for Livestock Vaccines.
We
have helped national research institutes transform themselves
into more multi-disciplinary, outcome-focused organisations.
Examples of our involvement in substantive management of change
processes include the 2nd National Agricultural Research Programme
in Kenya, and strategic planning in the Nepal Agricultural
Research Council.
Our
papers on demand-led research, and on public private partnerships,
have paved the way for new thinking on research systems.
|
 |